Skip to main content
IBC TotesSan Francisco
Case study · 2025

Forty totes for eleven weeks, and nothing to store in February

A Napa winery owned forty IBCs that worked hard for eleven weeks and then sat in a field for nine months, degrading in the sun. Leasing was 62% cheaper and the containers arrived clean every year.
A 45,000 case wineryNapa Valley, CA2025
Quote request

Start a similar project

No phone tag — email only

Describe the problem rather than the container. Most of the useful work in these jobs happened before anyone chose a product.

Letters, spaces, hyphens and apostrophes only.
Letters, spaces, hyphens and apostrophes only.
We reply here, so it has to be an inbox you read. Disposable addresses are rejected.
US and Canada only — 10 digits. Extensions go in the message.
Filled in automatically from your postal code.
US ZIP (94124) or Canadian postal code (M5V 2T6).
Whole containers. No minimum order.

We only use these details to quote your job. No lists, no resale, no robocalls — we do not even own a phone line.

Replacing forty owned IBC totes with a seasonal harvest lease cut this winery’s per-harvest container cost by 62%, from roughly $4,900 amortised to $1,870, and eliminated nine months of outdoor storage that was costing them four to six containers a year to UV degradation and freeze damage. Containers arrive food-line washed with certificates each August.

Interior of a warehouse with IBC totes racked on shelving and stored on the floor in a range of colours and conditions
08Colour tells you about prior contents, not about condition
Close view of IBC totes strapped in two tiers on a flatbed trailer, showing 275 gallon labels and ratchet straps
07Empty totes stack four high safely; full ones stop at two
Mixed-condition IBC totes in an outdoor yard under a blue sky, including one heavily stained amber unit
02Grade A, B and scrap, side by side, before the grading deck sorts them
62%Lower cost per harvest
$1.87kAnnual container cost, from $4,900
0Containers stored through winter
0.25 acLand returned to production
The brief

What we were given

  • 45,000 case production, harvest running mid-August to early November
  • Forty owned 275 gallon food-grade totes, average age six years
  • Outdoor storage on gravel between seasons, uncovered
  • Four to six containers replaced annually from weather damage
The problem

Four constraints

Eleven weeks of use, fifty-two weeks of ownership

The fleet was genuinely essential during crush and genuinely idle the rest of the year. Amortised across a five-year life with replacement losses, each harvest was costing about $4,900 in containers alone.

The sun was eating the fleet

Uncovered outdoor storage in Napa is harder on HDPE than in San Francisco — more sun, more heat, and occasional hard frosts. They were losing four to six containers a year, and the survivors were noticeably more brittle by year four.

Cleaning was happening in a hurry

Containers were being rinsed on site in August under time pressure, with no documentation. For a producer whose buyers increasingly ask about food-safety controls, that was becoming a commercial problem as well as a hygiene one.

Storage occupied land that could be planted

The container yard was a quarter acre of otherwise usable ground.

What we did

The solution, step by step

  1. A forty-unit seasonal lease, August to November

    Grade A food-safe stock, reserved in June, delivered the second week of August and collected in the second week of November. Priced at $44 per container per month for the harvest term.

  2. Food-line wash and certificates on arrival

    Every container arrives washed on our dedicated food line with a certificate tied to its unit number. The winery’s own HACCP documentation now references those certificates rather than an internal rinse log.

  3. Ten units bought outright for year-round use

    They genuinely needed a small standing fleet for cellar work. We sold them ten rebottled units for that, which live indoors, and leased the seasonal surge.

  4. Priority slots rather than a queue position

    Harvest dates move with the weather. The agreement gives them a two-week delivery window they can call within, rather than a fixed date they would inevitably have to change.

  5. Their old fleet bought back

    We purchased twenty-six of their forty containers at Grade B, credited against the first season’s lease, and recycled the fourteen that failed testing. That credit covered most of the first year.

A single clean 275 gallon caged IBC tote showing its data plate marked 275 Gallon 1041 Liter and Transport 1650 kg max
03Grade A washed, re-gasketed, tested at 3 psi and ready to ship
A blue tractor unit with a flatbed trailer loaded with strapped IBC totes beside a warehouse roller door
Loading for a scheduled run rather than a dedicated trip
A wide view of an outdoor container yard with dozens of stacked IBC totes, trees and blue sky behind
Looking across the yard toward the wash bays
The Bancroft Avenue reconditioning yard packed with IBC totes, with the Bay Bridge and the San Francisco skyline behind it
The Bancroft Avenue yard, looking north-west across the bay
Rows of used caged IBC totes stacked two high on a concrete pad under an overcast sky
Two-high storage on the north pad — empties only, never full
In their words

Feedback

The part I did not expect was not having a container yard any more. We had stopped seeing it as a cost because it had always been there.

Cellar master, Napa Valley winery

What went wrong

We under-reserved. The 2025 harvest came early across the whole valley and three of our leasing customers called their delivery window in the same ten days. We covered it by pulling forward a wash batch and running a Saturday shift, but two deliveries went out later than promised. Since then we hold a 15% buffer on food-grade leasing stock through September and we tell customers the buffer exists.